Gov. Code, § 12926(d); 29 U.S.C., § 2601, et. seq.↥
Soweit nicht anders erwähnt, gelten die Gesetze in diesem Artikel nicht für Mitarbeiter der Bundesregierung oder bestimmter Bundesauftragnehmer.↥
Siehe Gov. Code, § 12945.↥
Gov. Code, § 12945, subd. (a).↥
29 U.S.C. § 2612(a); Gov. Code, §§ 12945.2, 12945.6.↥
29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654; 29 C.F.R. §§ 825.100-825.803.↥
29 U.S.C. § 2612(a)(1).↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.2; Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, §§ 11087-11098.↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.2, subd. (a).↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.6, subd. (a).↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.6, subd. (a).↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.2, subd. (s) .↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.2, subd. (s) .↥
See Gov. Code, §§ 12945.2.↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.2.↥
Gov. Code, §§ 12945.2, subd. (c)(3), 12945.6.↥
Am 12. Oktober 2017 unterzeichnete Gouverneur Jerry Brown die Senate Bill No. 63 (Öffnet in einem neuen Fenster), die die Rechte auf Familien- und Krankheitsurlaub für kalifornische Arbeitnehmer erheblich erweiterte. Dieser Abschnitt spiegelt diese Änderungen wider, die am 1. Januar 2018 in Kraft traten.↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.6, subd. (a).↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.2, subd. (a).↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.2, subd. (a).↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11088, subd. (a).↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.2, subd. (c)(3).↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.2, subd. (c)(2); Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11087, subd. (d).↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.2, subd. (a).↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.2, subd. (a).↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.2, subd. (c)(8).↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11087, subd. (q)(1).↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11090, subd. (d) .↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11090, subd. (d) .↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11091, subd. (a)(1).↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11091, subd. (a)(1).↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11091, subd. (a)(1).↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11091, subd. (a)(2).↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11091, subd. (a)(2).↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11091, subd. (a)(3).↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11089, subd. (a)(1).↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11089, subd. (a)(2)(A).↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11089, subd. (b).↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11089, subd. (b).↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11089, subd. (b).↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11089, subd. (a)(2)(B).↥
Scientific American, Fathers-to-Be May Have Hormonal Changes Too (Öffnet in einem neuen Fenster) (letzter Zugriff 22. November 2017); WebMD, Expectant Dads May Also Have Hormonal Changes (Öffnet in einem neuen Fenster) (letzter Zugriff 22. November 2017).↥
Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (a).↥
Gov. Code, §§ 12926, subd. (j), 12926.1, subd. (c) , 12940, subd. (a).↥
Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (a), (m); Gelfo v. Lockheed Martin Corp. (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 34, 54.↥
Nealy v. City of Santa Monica (2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 359, 373.↥
Sanchez v. Swissport, Inc. (2013) 213 Cal.App.4th 1331, 1338-1341.↥
Gov. Code, § 12926, subd. (d), 12940, subd. (a); Cal. Code of Regs., tit. 2, § 11008, subd. (d).↥
Gov. Code, §§ 12926, subd. (d), (i)(2), 12926.1, 12940, subd. (a).↥
Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (a), (m); Cal. Code of Regs., tit. 2, § 11068, subd. (a).↥
Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (m).↥
Ein Agent ist eine Person, die im Namen eines Arbeitgebers handelt. (Civ. Code, § 2295.) Der Arbeitgeber muss zustimmen, dass der Vertreter in seinem Namen handelt, damit diese Art von Beziehung besteht. (Rental Housing Owners Assn. of Southern Alameda County, Inc. v. City of Hayward (2011) 200 Cal.App.4th 81, 91 .)↥
Gov. Code, § 12926, subd. (d), 12945, subd. (a); Cal. Code of Regs., tit. 2, § 11035, subd. (e).↥
Gov. Code, § 12926, subd. (d).↥
Gov. Code, § 12926, subd. (d).↥
Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (m) oder ein Arbeitgeber oder eine andere Einrichtung, die unter diesen Teil fällt, versäumt, angemessene Vorkehrungen für die bekannte körperliche oder geistige Behinderung eines Bewerbers oder Mitarbeiters zu treffen.“].↥
Gov. Code, § 12926, subd. (j)(1); Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11065, subd. (d)(1).↥
Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (a).↥
Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (j)(4), (j)(5).↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11065, subd. (d)(1).↥
Gov. Code, § 12926, subd. (j)(5); Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11065, subd. (d)(9)(A) , (q).↥
Nealy v. City of Santa Monica (2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 359, 373.↥
Hanson v. Lucky Stores, Inc. (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 215, 228, fn. 11.↥
Hanson v. Lucky Stores, Inc. (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 215, 228, fn. 11 .↥
Prilliman v. United Air Lines, Inc. (1997) 53 Cal.App.4th 935, 948.↥
Cal. Code of Regs., tit. 2, § 11068, subd. (e).↥
Cal. Code of Regs., tit. 2, § 11068, subd. (e).↥
Hanson v. Lucky Stores, Inc. (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 215, 228 he employer providing the accommodation has the ultimate discretion to choose between effective accommodations, and may choose the less expensive accommodation or the accommodation that is easier for it to provide.“ (Anführungszeichen ausgelassen.)], zitiert nach Hankins v. The Gap, Inc. (6th Cir. 1996) 84 F.3d 797, 800-801.↥
Sterling Transit Co. v. Fair Employment Practice Com. (1981) 121 Cal.App.3d 791, 798.↥
Nealy v. City of Santa Monica (2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 359, 374; Gov. Code, § 12926, subd. (p)(2); Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11065, subd. (p)(2).↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, §§ 11065, subd. (p)(2)(M), 11068, subd. (c).↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11068, subd. (c).↥
Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (a)(1).↥
Gov. Code, § 12926, subd. (f).↥
Gov. Code, § 12926, subd. (f)(1); Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11065, subd. (e)(1)(A); Lui v. San Francisco (2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 962, 972.↥
See, e.g., Gov. Code, § 12926, subd. (f)(1) .↥
Gov. Code, § 12926, subd. (f); Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11065, subd. (e)(3).↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11065, subd. (e)(3).↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11065, subd. (e)(3).↥
Green v. State (2007) 42 Cal.4th 254, 258 he FEHA requires employees to prove that they are qualified individuals under the statute just as the federal ADA requires.“]; Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, §§ 11065, subd. (o) , 11066, subd. (a) .↥
Prilliman v. United Air Lines, Inc. (1997) 53 Cal.App.4th 935, 947; Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11065, subd. (r).↥
Prilliman v. United Air Lines, Inc. (1997) 53 Cal.App.4th 935, 947; Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11065, subd. (r).↥
Für andere Faktoren, siehe Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11065, subd. (r).↥
Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (n); Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11069.↥
Wilson v. County of Orange (2009) 169 Cal.App.4th 1185, 1195.↥
Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (n).↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11069, subd. (a).↥
Gelfo v. Lockheed Martin Corp. (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 34, 54.↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11069, subds. (d)(1), (f).↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11069, subd. (g).↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11069, subd. (g).↥
Swanson v. Morongo Unified School Dist. (2014) 232 Cal.App.4th 954, 971 .↥
Deschene v. Pinole Point Steel Co. (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 33, 44.↥
Siehe Brundage v. Hahn (1997) 57 Cal.App.4th 228, 237.↥
Faust v. California Portland Cement Co. (2007) 150 Cal.App.4th 864, 887.↥
Faust v. California Portland Cement Co. (2007) 150 Cal.App.4th 864, 887.↥
Scotch v. Art Institute of California-Orange County, Inc. (2009) 173 Cal.App.4th 986, 1013; Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11069, subd. (b).↥
Swanson v. Morongo Unified School Dist. (2014) 232 Cal.App.4th 954, 971.↥
Brundage v. Hahn (1997) 57 Cal.App.4th 228, 236-237.↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11069, subd. (d)(1).↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11069, subd. (f).↥
Unemp. Ins. Code, §§ 2655, subd. (e), 3301, subds. (b), (c); Siehe State of California Employment Development Department, FAQs – Paid Family Leave (PFL) Benefits, abrufbar unter: Frequently Asked Questions About Paid Family Leave Benefits (Öffnet in neuem Fenster).↥
Gov. Code, §§ 12945, 12945.2, subd. (e).↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.2, subd. (e) .↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.2, subd. (f)(2).↥
Gov. Code, § 12965, subd. (b).↥
Gov. Code, § 12960, subd. (b).↥
Martin v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Co. (1994) 29 Cal.App.4th 1718, 1724; Williams v. City of Belvedere (1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 84, 90.↥
Gov. Code, § 12965, subd. (b).↥
Gov. Code, § 12960; Romano v. Rockwell Internat., Inc. (1996) 14 Cal.4th 479, 492 .↥
Gov. Code, § 12965, subd. (d)(2).↥
Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (h).↥
Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (h).↥