Gov. Code, § 12926(d); 29 U.S.C., § 2601, et. seq.↥
Se non diversamente indicato, le leggi in questo articolo non si applicano ai dipendenti del governo federale o a certi appaltatori federali.↥
Vedi Gov. Code, § 12945.↥
Gov. Code, § 12945, subd. (a) .↥
29 U.S.C. § 2612(a); Gov. Code, §§ 12945.2, 12945.6.↥
29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654; 29 C.F.R. §§ 825.100-825.803.↥
29 U.S.C. § 2612(a)(1).↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.2; Cal. Code Regs. 2, §§ 11087-11098.↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.2, subd. (a).↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.6, subd. (a).↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.6, subd. (a).↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.2, subd. (s) .↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.2, subd. (s) .↥
See Gov. Code, §§ 12945.2.↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.2.↥
Gov. Code, §§ 12945.2, subd. (c)(3), 12945.6.↥
Il 12 ottobre 2017, il governatore Jerry Brown ha firmato il Senate Bill No. 63 (Opens in new window), che ha notevolmente ampliato i diritti di congedo familiare e medico per i dipendenti della California. Questa sezione riflette tali cambiamenti, che sono entrati in vigore il 1° gennaio 2018.↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.6, subd. (a).↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.2, subd. (a).↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.2, subd. (a).↥
Cal. Code Regs. 2, § 11088, subd. (a).↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.2, subd. (c)(3).↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.2, subd. (c)(2); Cal. Code Regs. 2, § 11087, subd. (d).↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.2, subd. (a).↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.2, subd. (a).↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.2, subd. (c)(8).↥
Cal. Code Regs. 2, § 11087, subd. (q)(1) .↥
Cal. Code Regs. 2, § 11090, subd. (d) .↥
Cal. Code Regs. 2, § 11090, subd. (d) .↥
Cal. Code Regs. 2, § 11091, subd. (a)(1).↥
Cal. Code Regs. 2, § 11091, subd. (a)(1).↥
Cal. Code Regs. 2, § 11091, subd. (a)(1).↥
Cal. Code Regs. 2, § 11091, subd. (a)(2).↥
Cal. Code Regs. 2, § 11091, subd. (a)(2).↥
Cal. Code Regs. 2, § 11091, subd. (a)(3).↥
Cal. Code Regs. 2, § 11089, subd. (a)(1) .↥
Cal. Code Regs. 2, § 11089, subd. (a)(2)(A) .↥
Cal. Code Regs. 2, § 11089, subd. (b).↥
Cal. Code Regs. 2, § 11089, subd. (b).↥
Cal. Code Regs. 2, § 11089, subd. (b).↥
Cal. Code Regs. 2, § 11089, subd. (a)(2)(B).↥
Scientific American, Fathers-to-Be May Have Hormonal Changes Too (Opens in new window) (ultimo accesso 22 novembre 2017); WebMD, Expectant Dads May Also Have Hormonal Changes (Opens in new window) (ultimo accesso 22 novembre 2017).↥
Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (a).↥
Gov. Code, §§ 12926, subd. (j), 12926.1, subd. (c) , 12940, subd. (a).↥
Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (a), (m); Gelfo v. Lockheed Martin Corp. (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 34, 54 .↥
Nealy v. City of Santa Monica (2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 359, 373.↥
Sanchez v. Swissport, Inc. (2013) 213 Cal.App.4th 1331, 1338-1341.↥
Gov. Code, § 12926, subd. (d), 12940, subd. (a); Cal. Code of Regs, tit. 2, § 11008, subd. (d).↥
Gov. Code, §§ 12926, subds. (d), (i)(2), 12926.1, 12940, subd. (a).↥
Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (a), (m); Cal. Code of Regs, tit. 2, § 11068, subd. (a).↥
Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (m).↥
Un agente è una persona che agisce per conto di un datore di lavoro. (Civ. Code, § 2295.) Il datore di lavoro deve accettare che l’agente agisca per suo conto perché questo tipo di rapporto esista. (Rental Housing Owners Assn. of Southern Alameda County, Inc. v. City of Hayward (2011) 200 Cal.App.4th 81, 91 .)↥
Gov. Code, § 12926, subd. (d), 12945, subd. (a); Cal. Code of Regs., tit. 2, § 11035, subd. (e).↥
Gov. Code, § 12926, subd. (d).↥
Gov. Code, § 12926, subd. (d).↥
Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (m) o un datore di lavoro o un’altra entità coperta da questa parte per non fare una sistemazione ragionevole per la nota disabilità fisica o mentale di un richiedente o dipendente”].↥
Gov. Code, § 12926, subd. (j)(1); Cal. Code Regs. 2, § 11065, subd. (d)(1).↥
Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (a).↥
Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (j)(4), (j)(5).↥
Cal. Code Regs. 2, § 11065, subd. (d)(1).↥
Gov. Code, § 12926, subd. (j)(5); Cal. Code Regs. 2, § 11065, subds. (d)(9)(A) , (q).↥
Nealy v. City of Santa Monica (2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 359, 373.↥
Hanson v. Lucky Stores, Inc. (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 215, 228, fn. 11 .↥
Hanson v. Lucky Stores, Inc. (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 215, 228, fn. 11 .↥
Prilliman v. United Air Lines, Inc. (1997) 53 Cal.App.4th 935, 948.↥
Cal. Code of Regs., tit. 2, § 11068, subd. (e).↥
Cal. Code of Regs., tit. 2, § 11068, subd. (e).↥
Hanson v. Lucky Stores, Inc. (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 215, 228 l datore di lavoro che fornisce la sistemazione ha la discrezione finale di scegliere tra sistemazioni efficaci, e può scegliere la sistemazione meno costosa o la sistemazione che è più facile da fornire”. (virgolette omesse)], citando Hankins v. The Gap, Inc. (6th Cir. 1996) 84 F.3d 797, 800-801.↥
Sterling Transit Co. v. Fair Employment Practice Com. (1981) 121 Cal.App.3d 791, 798 .↥
Nealy v. City of Santa Monica (2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 359, 374; Gov. Code, § 12926, subd. (p)(2); Cal. Code Regs. 2, § 11065, subd. (p)(2).↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, §§ 11065, subd. (p)(2)(M), 11068, subd. (c).↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11068, subd. (c).↥
Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (a)(1).↥
Gov. Code, § 12926, subd. (f).↥
Gov. Code, § 12926, subd. (f)(1); Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11065, subd. (e)(1)(A); Lui v. San Francisco (2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 962, 972.↥
Vedi, ad esempio, Gov. Code, § 12926, subd. (f)(1) .↥
Gov. Code, § 12926, subd. (f); Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11065, subd. (e)(3).↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11065, subd. (e)(3) .↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11065, subd. (e)(3).↥
Green v. State (2007) 42 Cal.4th 254, 258 he FEHA richiede ai dipendenti di provare che sono individui qualificati secondo lo statuto proprio come richiede l’ADA federale”]; Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, §§ 11065, subd. (o) , 11066, subd. (a) .↥
Prilliman v. United Air Lines, Inc. (1997) 53 Cal.App.4th 935, 947; Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11065, subd. (r) .↥
Prilliman v. United Air Lines, Inc. (1997) 53 Cal.App.4th 935, 947; Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11065, subd. (r).↥
Per altri fattori, vedi Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11065, subd. (r).↥
Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (n); Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11069.↥
Wilson v. County of Orange (2009) 169 Cal.App.4th 1185, 1195.↥
Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (n).↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11069, subd. (a).↥
Gelfo v. Lockheed Martin Corp. (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 34, 54.↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11069, subds. (d)(1), (f).↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11069, subd. (g).↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11069, subd. (g).↥
Swanson v. Morongo Unified School Dist. (2014) 232 Cal.App.4th 954, 971 .↥
Deschene v. Pinole Point Steel Co. (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 33, 44.↥
Vedi Brundage v. Hahn (1997) 57 Cal.App.4th 228, 237 .↥
Faust v. California Portland Cement Co. (2007) 150 Cal.App.4th 864, 887.↥
Faust v. California Portland Cement Co. (2007) 150 Cal.App.4th 864, 887.↥
Scotch v. Art Institute of California-Orange County, Inc. (2009) 173 Cal.App.4th 986, 1013; Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11069, subd. (b).↥
Swanson v. Morongo Unified School Dist. (2014) 232 Cal.App.4th 954, 971.↥
Brundage v. Hahn (1997) 57 Cal.App.4th 228, 236-237.↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11069, subd. (d)(1).↥
Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 11069, subd. (f).↥
Unemp. Ins. Code, §§ 2655, subd. (e), 3301, subds. (b), (c); Vedi State of California Employment Development Department, FAQs – Paid Family Leave (PFL) Benefits, disponibile al seguente indirizzo: Frequently Asked Questions About Paid Family Leave Benefits (Opens in new window).↥
Gov. Code, §§ 12945, 12945.2, subd. (e).↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.2, subd. (e) .↥
Gov. Code, § 12945.2, subd. (f)(2).↥
Gov. Code, § 12965, subd. (b).↥
Gov. Code, § 12960, subd. (b).↥
Martin v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Co. (1994) 29 Cal.App.4th 1718, 1724; Williams v. City of Belvedere (1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 84, 90 .↥
Gov. Code, § 12965, subd. (b) .↥
Gov. Code, § 12960; Romano v. Rockwell Internat. (1996) 14 Cal.4th 479, 492 .↥
Gov. Code, § 12965, subd. (d)(2).↥
Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (h).↥
Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (h).↥